Skip to content
Commit 4fdecac9 authored by Thomas Petazzoni's avatar Thomas Petazzoni
Browse files

Solve the host tools relying on host libraries problem

We build host tools installed in $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin, and some of them
rely on host libraries in $(HOST_DIR)/usr/lib. So when these host
tools are executed, they need to find the host libraries, which are
not installed in a default location.

In c1b6242f we tried to use
LD_LIBRARY_PATH when building target packages to solve this
problem. Unfortunately, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not only used to find
libraries at run-time, but also at compile time. So it leads the build
of some packages, such as icu, to fail.

Therefore, in 0d1830b0, we reverted
the LD_LIBRARY_PATH idea.

The other option to solve this problem was to hardcode a RPATH value
in the host binaries that would reference the location of host
libraries. We added this -Wl,-rpath option to HOST_CFLAGS in
6b939d40. Unfortunately, this caused
problems when building binutils, as reported in bug 1789 so this
change was reverted in e1a7d916.

Then, we tried to use -Wl,-rpath in HOST_LDFLAGS, but it was causing
problems with fakeroot not recognizing 'ld' as the GNU linker, since
the -Wl,-rpath cannot be understood by 'ld' directly, only by 'gcc'.

This commit is a new attempt at using HOST_LDFLAGS, but in this case
we modified the definition of HOST_LD to *not* contain
HOST_LDFLAGS. LDFLAGS are being set separatly. It solved the fakeroot
issue and was tested against nearly 300 packages of Buildroot.

For more details on this story, see
 http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-June/035580.html
 http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-June/035581.html
 http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-June/035586.html
 http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-June/035609.html
 https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1789



Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
parent daa537c3
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment