Skip to content
Commit 4960e54a authored by Patrick Bellasi's avatar Patrick Bellasi Committed by Dietmar Eggemann
Browse files

sched/fair: Add uclamp support to energy_compute()



The Energy Aware Scheduler (AES) estimates the energy impact of waking
up a task on a given CPU. This estimation is based on:
 a) an (active) power consumptions defined for each CPU frequency
 b) an estimation of which frequency will be used on each CPU
 c) an estimation of the busy time (utilization) of each CPU

Utilization clamping can affect both b) and c) estimations. A CPU is
expected to run:
 - on an higher than required frequency, but for a shorter time, in case
   its estimated utilization will be smaller then the minimum utilization
   enforced by uclamp
 - on a smaller than required frequency, but for a longer time, in case
   its estimated utilization is bigger then the maximum utilization
   enforced by uclamp

While effects on busy time for both boosted/capped tasks are already
considered by compute_energy(), clamping effects on frequency selection
are currently ignored by that function.

Fix it by considering how CPU clamp values will be affected by a
task waking up and being RUNNABLE on that CPU.

Do that by refactoring schedutil_freq_util() to take an additional
task_struct* which allows EAS to evaluate the impact on clamp values of
a task being eventually queued in a CPU. Clamp values are applied to the
RT+CFS utilization only when a FREQUENCY_UTIL is required by
compute_energy().

Since we are at that:
- rename schedutil_freq_util() into schedutil_cpu_util(),
  since it's not only used for frequency selection.
- use "unsigned int" instead of "unsigned long" whenever the tracked
  utilization value is not expected to overflow 32bit.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent f74b6e18
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment