fs: don't needlessly acquire f_lock

Before 2011 there was no meaningful synchronization between
read/readdir/write/seek. Only in commit
ef3d0fd2 ("vfs: do (nearly) lockless generic_file_llseek")
synchronization was added for SEEK_CUR by taking f_lock around
vfs_setpos().

Then in 2014 full synchronization between read/readdir/write/seek was
added in commit 9c225f26 ("vfs: atomic f_pos accesses as per POSIX")
by introducing f_pos_lock for regular files with FMODE_ATOMIC_POS and
for directories. At that point taking f_lock became unnecessary for such
files.

So only acquire f_lock for SEEK_CUR if this isn't a file that would have
acquired f_pos_lock if necessary.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250207-daten-mahlzeit-99d2079864fb@brauner


Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>